Conventional warfare is a traditional form of conflict conducted between regular state armies, based on physical confrontation and defined within the framework of international law. These wars are typically fought on open fronts, involving land, sea, and air forces. The parties are clearly defined; features such as military uniforms, declarations of war, and conflicts occurring in specific geographical areas characterize this type of warfare. In conventional war, the balance of power, military discipline, and hierarchy are of great importance. The legal framework is based on the principle that civilians should not be directly targeted and that the laws of war must be observed.
(AI generated image)
Historical Context and Evolution
In the modern sense, conventional warfare emerged as a structured and rule-defined form of conflict alongside the formation of nation-states. Particularly in 17th-century Europe, as centralized authority gained strength, irregular militia forces and units tied to feudal lords were replaced by professional and regular armies under state control. This transformation not only led to the technical development of military structures but also established a legal and political basis for defining warfare.
The 18th and 19th centuries were periods when the classical characteristics of conventional warfare became more pronounced. Wars during this time were fought between regular, uniformed armies along specific front lines; processes such as declarations of war, ceasefires, and peace treaties developed according to established international conventions. The Napoleonic Wars are among the first examples of the effective use of mass army mobilization, artillery power, and tactical maneuvers. These wars played a key role in shaping conventional war doctrines.
The 19th century witnessed both the peak and the transformation of conventional warfare. World War I revealed the destructive nature of this form of conflict through prolonged trench warfare, the use of chemical weapons, and large-scale casualties. World War II presented a multi-front war scenario in which land, sea, and air forces were integrated, and where armored units and aerial bombardments were decisive. This period also accelerated the development of the laws of war and the international community’s efforts to limit conflict through normative frameworks.
During the Cold War, the deterrent effect of nuclear weapons prevented large-scale direct conventional conflicts. However, proxy wars like the Korean War and the Vietnam War demonstrated that conventional military elements still held relevance. Military alliances such as NATO and the Warsaw Pact invested heavily in maintaining conventional capabilities and advancing technological modernization.
In the post-Cold War era, the rise of non-state armed actors, the spread of asymmetric threats, and technological advances have somewhat limited the status of conventional warfare as the sole valid form of conflict. Nevertheless, examples such as the Russia–Georgia War (2008), the Azerbaijan–Armenia conflicts (especially the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War), and the Russia–Ukraine War illustrate that conventional warfare continues to be a significant form of conflict in today’s international security environment.
(AI generated image)
Force Components and Operational Structures
Land Forces
Land forces are the most classic and central component of conventional warfare, providing direct territorial control and area dominance. Composed of subunits like infantry, armored elements, and artillery units, land forces play a decisive role in both offensive and defensive phases of warfare. Strategic goals such as capturing key areas, fortifying positions, and controlling logistical bases depend on the operational capabilities of ground forces.
Air Forces
Air forces represent the speed, range, and high destructive power of conventional warfare. These forces perform functions such as securing air superiority, conducting precision strikes on enemy targets, and carrying out reconnaissance operations. Modern air power also directly affects tactical balance on the battlefield by enhancing the mobility and effectiveness of ground and naval units. Electronic warfare and unmanned aerial vehicles further diversify the capabilities of air forces.
Naval Forces
Naval forces handle responsibilities in the maritime domain such as securing sea lanes, defending coastal regions, and projecting power over the seas. Assets like aircraft carriers, submarines, and destroyers enhance the strategic flexibility of naval forces. Operations such as sea control and naval blockades shape the economic and logistical dimensions of conventional warfare.
Space Components
In recent years, space has become an increasingly important dimension of conventional warfare. Satellite technologies play a critical role in communication, navigation, early warning, and imagery intelligence during the planning and execution of military operations. Integrating space-based systems into military strategies has become a strategic necessity, particularly for maintaining command-and-control continuity. Furthermore, the deployment of defense platforms in space holds the potential to further transform the nature of conventional conflict in the future.
Integration and Command-Control Structures
Effective use of these force components depends on advanced command-and-control systems and a robust logistical infrastructure. Joint operations centers, inter-force communication, and interoperability capabilities are critical in the multidimensional structure of conventional warfare. Additionally, the integration of military technologies and data-centric operational planning processes shorten decision-making time and play a decisive role in gaining battlefield superiority.
(AI generated image)
The Current State of Conventional Warfare
The 21st-century security environment reflects a time when conventional warfare both persists and undergoes significant transformation. The decreased frequency of open inter-state wars does not mean this form of warfare has ended. On the contrary, strategic rivalry among major powers has led to a renewed emphasis on conventional military capacity. Modern conventional warfare no longer relies solely on manpower and traditional equipment but also on advanced technologies, network-centric warfare, and multi-domain operational capabilities.
Technological advances have fundamentally changed the nature of conventional warfare. Satellite-based communication systems, intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and precision-guided munitions have enabled warfare to be conducted more flexibly and effectively in terms of time and space. However, this technological dependence also introduces serious vulnerabilities. Threats such as electronic warfare, cyberattacks, and anti-satellite systems can significantly undermine the effectiveness of these technologies.
Today’s security architecture is also intertwined with hybrid and asymmetric threats. The increasing influence of non-state actors, information warfare, cyberattacks, and the use of irregular forces challenge the traditional patterns of conventional conflict. These developments have turned warfare into a multidimensional phenomenon that includes not only military but also economic, informational, and psychological aspects. Nonetheless, this diversity has not diminished the strategic value of conventional warfare. On the contrary, it has reinforced the need for a strong and ready conventional deterrence capacity to confront such threats.
In this context, states are undergoing restructuring processes in their conventional force structures, accelerating modernization projects, and prioritizing concepts such as interoperability. Alliances like NATO have made conventional force compatibility and rapid deployability among members a strategic priority. Similarly, individual states such as China and Russia are diversifying their force planning to prepare their armed forces for both conventional warfare scenarios and hybrid threat environments simultaneously.
