Teacher burnout is a state of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion experienced by practicing teachers as a result of prolonged exposure to the stress and demands of their profession. This condition, commonly seen in occupations that require intense and direct interaction with people, is widely recognized as a frequent phenomenon in the teaching profession.
The concept of burnout was first introduced in 1974 by Herbert Freudenberger to describe conditions he observed among volunteer health workers, such as fatigue, loss of energy, frustration, and lack of motivation. Freudenberger defined burnout as "a state of exhaustion resulting from failed, worn-out, or dissipated energy, or from unmet demands on one's inner resources".
In the 1980s, the concept was further developed by Christina Maslach and Susan E. Jackson, gaining widespread traction in the social sciences. Maslach and Jackson treated burnout as a "syndrome with physical and mental dimensions, encompassing negative attitudes an individual displays toward their work, life, and other people". Their work, along with the development of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), enabled the empirical study of the concept.
The most widely accepted model in burnout research is the three-dimensional theoretical framework developed by Maslach and her colleagues. According to this model, teacher burnout consists of three core components:
Considered the central and most fundamental component of burnout, this dimension refers to a teacher's feeling of being overly tired, drained, and depleted of energy due to the emotional demands of their job. Teachers who feel their emotional resources are exhausted may experience great anxiety and reluctance about going to work the next day. This is particularly evident in professions like teaching, where intense, face-to-face interaction is unavoidable.
This dimension involves the development of cynical, negative, and detached attitudes toward the students, parents, and colleagues one serves. An individual experiencing emotional exhaustion may, as a defense mechanism, create distance between themselves and the people they serve, treating them as objects rather than individuals. This results in the person becoming cold and indifferent to the problems and demands of others.
This dimension refers to a teacher's perception of themselves as incompetent and unsuccessful in their profession. The individual feels they cannot overcome work-related problems, are not progressing in their career, and are failing to achieve their goals. This is characterized by low morale, a poor self-concept, and a negative evaluation of one's work.
Another model related to teacher burnout was proposed by Kyriacou and Suttcliffe in 1978. According to this model, stress and burnout are the result of a teacher's perceptions, such as believing the demands upon them are excessive, struggling to meet these demands, and feeling their mental and physical health is endangered by their perceived failures.
Teacher burnout arises from the interaction of a series of individual, social, and organizational factors. Research categorizes these factors into two main groups.
Factors in this group encompass the teacher's demographic characteristics and personal life. These include variables such as age, gender, marital status, educational level, professional seniority, personality traits, and job satisfaction. Support from family and social circles (friends, colleagues) are also significant social factors that affect burnout levels. However, many studies have shown that demographic variables (gender, age, marital status, education level, and professional seniority) do not create a significant difference in teachers' perceptions of burnout.
These factors, related to the institution where the teacher works and the nature of the profession, are seen as having a more pronounced effect on burnout. Key organizational and professional factors include:
The most widely used tool in the literature for measuring teacher burnout is the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), developed by Maslach and Jackson. An Educator Form (MTE-EF) of the inventory has been developed for professionals working in the education sector, such as teachers.
This scale consists of subscales that measure the three dimensions of burnout: "Emotional Exhaustion," "Depersonalization," and "Personal Accomplishment". The inventory was adapted into Turkish by C. Ergin (1992), and its validity and reliability studies were conducted. In the scoring system, high scores on the Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization subscales and low scores on the Personal Accomplishment subscale indicate a high level of burnout.
Teacher burnout leads to various negative consequences at both the individual and organizational levels.
Preventing burnout requires interventions at both the individual and organizational levels. Some recommended strategies include:
In Türkiye, there are various national policies that indirectly affect the working conditions and professional competencies of teachers. Particularly in the Development Plans and Informatics Councils prepared since the 1980s, the goal of transforming Türkiye into an "information society" has been emphasized. These documents include objectives such as disseminating technology in education, increasing computer literacy, and organizing in-service training for teachers.
However, it has been observed that there are sometimes shortcomings in achieving the goals stated in these plans and in fully implementing the policies. These discrepancies between policy and practice can lead to the persistence of resource shortages in schools and leave teachers to fend for themselves in areas like technology integration, which in turn can become a factor that triggers burnout.
Akyürek, Muhammet İbrahim. “Öğretmenlerde Tükenmişlik.” Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1, no. 37 (2020): 35–47. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/zgefd/issue/54277/657574.
Avcı, Ümmühan, and Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu. “Bilgi Toplumunda Öğretmenin Tükenmişliği: Teknoloji Kullanımı ve Tükenmişliği Önlemeye Yönelik Alınabilecek Önlemler.” Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 9, no. 1 (2011): 13–26. https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~sadi/yayin/Avci-Seferoglu_MJER-2011-9_Tukenmislik.pdf.
Bakan, İsmail, Burcu Erşahan, Tuba Büyükbeşe, İnci Fatma Doğan, and İlker Kefe. “Dönüşümcü ve Etkileşimci Liderlik ile Öğretmenlerin Tükenmişlik Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki.” Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 14 (2015). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ulikidince/issue/21614/232165.
Cemaloğlu, Necati, and Yücel Kayabaşı. “Öğretmenlerin Tükenmişlik Düzeyi ile Sınıf Yönetiminde Kullandıkları Disiplin Modelleri Arasındaki İlişki.” Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 27, no. 2 (2007): 123–155. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gefad/issue/6750/90761.
Çelikkaleli, Öner. “Yetişkin Eğitimcisi Öğretmenlerin Tükenmişlik ve Mesleki Yetkinliklerinin İncelenmesi.” Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 4 (2011): 38–53. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/makusobed/issue/19436/206696.
Definition and Historical Development
Theoretical Approaches and Dimensions
Emotional Exhaustion
Depersonalization
Reduced Personal Accomplishment
Factors Causing Burnout
Individual and Social Factors
Organizational and Professional Factors
Measurement
Consequences and Prevention
Related Policies and Regulations in Türkiye
This article was created with the support of artificial intelligence.