logologo
Ai badge logo

This article was created with the support of artificial intelligence.

ArticleDiscussion

Code Review

fav gif
Save
viki star outline
Gemini_Generated_Image_wv3w11wv3w11wv3w.png

Generated with artificial intelligence.

Code Review
Field
Software Engineering
Main Objectives
Error PreventionQuality AssuranceKnowledge SharingEnsuring Code Standards
Methods
Formal (Fagan Inspection)Informal (Pull Request Based)Pair Programming
Tools
GitHubGitLabBitbucketGerritSonarQubeESLint

Code Review refers to the systematic process of reviewing software code. This process aims to increase the accuracy, readability, maintainability, and security of the code. Code review is considered an important part of the software development life cycle and contributes to improving software quality both individually and at the team level.

Fundamental Principles and Implementation Methods of Code Review

Purpose and Importance of Code Review

Code review is carried out with the aim of early detection and correction of errors that may arise during the software development process. This process aims to evaluate the functionality, performance, and security of the code. In addition, compliance with standards is checked to facilitate the understanding and maintenance of the code. Code review encourages knowledge sharing among software teams and helps team members develop a common understanding of code quality.

Types of Code Review

Code review can be performed using different methods:

  • Peer Review: A generally informal process carried out between two developers. The aim is to detect and correct errors by reviewing the code together.
  • Formal Review: A process carried out within the framework of specific rules and procedures, usually involving documentation. It ensures that the code is evaluated and documented according to certain criteria.
  • Tool-Assisted Review: A process carried out using code review tools. These tools allow for automatic analysis and evaluation of the code according to specific metrics.

Code Review Process

The code review process generally includes the following steps:

  1. Code Preparation: The developer prepares the code for review and adds the necessary documentation.
  2. Review Request: A request for code review is created and notified to the relevant team members.
  3. Review: Designated team members evaluate the code according to specific criteria and provide feedback.
  4. Feedback and Correction: The developer makes the necessary corrections to the code based on the feedback received.
  5. Approval and Merging: After the code passes the review process, it is approved and integrated into the main codebase.

Benefits and Challenges of Code Review

Benefits

  • Bug Detection: Code review ensures early detection and correction of errors, which increases software reliability.
  • Increased Code Quality: Overall code quality is improved by evaluating the code's readability, maintainability, and compliance with standards.
  • Knowledge Sharing: Knowledge sharing among team members is encouraged, which enhances intra-team learning and collaboration.
  • Compliance with Standards: Consistency is ensured by checking the code's compliance with specific standards and best practices.

Challenges

  • Time and Resource Consumption: Code review is a process that requires time and human resources. This can be a challenge, especially in projects with tight schedules.
  • Communication Issues: Ineffective communication or misunderstanding of feedback can lead to intra-team communication problems.
  • Lack of Motivation: Team members not giving sufficient importance to code review or perceiving the process as unnecessary can lead to a lack of motivation.
  • Tool and Process Alignment: Incompatibility of the code review tools and processes used with team needs can reduce efficiency.

Practices and Tools Used in Code Review

Practices

  • Defining Standards: Clear standards and criteria for code review should be defined, and all team members should act in accordance with these standards.
  • Training and Information: Team members should be trained on the code review process and its importance, and continuous information should be provided.
  • Communication and Feedback: Feedback should be clear, constructive, and specific; effective communication among team members should be encouraged.
  • Tool Usage: Code review tools should be used effectively, and the process should be automated to increase efficiency.

Code Review Tools

  • GitHub: A platform that provides code hosting and version control. Code review can be done through pull requests.
  • GitLab: A Git-based version control platform. It offers integrated code review and continuous integration features.
  • Bitbucket: A version control platform developed by Atlassian. It includes code review and collaboration features.
  • Crucible: A code review tool offered by Atlassian. It provides detailed review and feedback features.
  • Review Board: A web-based code review tool. It can integrate with different version control systems.

Bibliographies

Bacchelli, Alberto, and Christian Bird. “Expectations, Outcomes, and Challenges of Modern Code Review.” Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, 2013, 712–721. Accessed: May 18, 2025. Access Address.

Czerwonka, J., Greiler, M., & Tilford, J. (2015). Code reviews do not find bugs. How the current code review best practice slows us down. 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering. Accessed: May 18, 2025. Access Address.

Fagan, Michael E. “Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development.” IBM Systems Journal 15, no. 3 (1976): 182–211. Accessed: May 18, 2025. Access Address.

McIntosh, S., Kamei, Y., Adams, B., & Hassan, A. E. (2014). The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the qt, VTK, and ITK projects. Accessed: May 18, 2025. Access Address.

Rigby, Peter C., and Christian Bird. “Convergent Contemporary Software Peer Review Practices.” Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2013, 202–212. Accessed: May 18, 2025. Access Address.

You Can Rate Too!

0 Ratings

Author Information

Avatar
Main AuthorOkan KanpolatJune 10, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Ask to Küre