This article was automatically translated from the original Turkish version.
The conquest of Istanbul is one of the greatest victories of Ottoman Sultan Fatih Sultan Mehmet, and this event has been remembered throughout history through various legends and debates. One of these is the claim that, after the Ottoman fleet suffered setbacks, its ships were transported overland to Istanbul—a notion that has persisted to the present day. This issue has been the subject of intense debate among historians and researchers.
According to documented and verifiable sources, the Ottoman fleet employed various techniques during and before the siege. However, the claim that ships were transported overland gained popularity especially after the 19th century and was promoted by numerous researchers. The absence of definitive, concrete evidence—verified through archaeology or modern technology—that ships were indeed moved overland has fueled the controversy. Supporters of the overland transport theory point to Ottoman archival documents and chronicles as proof.
Counterview on the claim that ships were transported overland. (HT Science, History and Philosophy)
Moving ships, especially during that period, was an extremely difficult and demanding engineering task. Even with today’s technology, transporting ships over a distance of 700 meters would take several hours. Given the technological limitations of the time, carrying out such an operation in a similarly short timeframe would have been virtually impossible. Moreover, considering the size and structure of the ships, the likelihood of them being transported overland is considered very low.
The ships of the Ottoman fleet were most likely constructed in the empire’s major shipyards, particularly along the coasts of Rumelia and Anatolia. These vessels were built using the most advanced techniques of the era and were made ready before the siege. Some sources indicate that wooden materials and stone or iron keels were used in their construction, and that these were large-scale projects.
Video on the Conquest of Istanbul. (HT Science, History and Philosophy)
The process of launching and preparing the ships for sea was complex and required meticulous planning. Even with today’s technology, such a maneuver would not be easily accomplished. The central point of debate is whether the Ottomans could have carried out this operation with sufficient secrecy and organization to avoid detection.
An additional argument against the overland transport theory is the improbability that the Ottomans could have executed such a massive project so close to Byzantine territory without being noticed. Opposing views, however, argue that secrecy was maintained through the following methods:
The generally accepted view is that the Ottoman fleet was constructed using highly sophisticated and organized methods, then transported in secrecy and without detection to Istanbul. In contrast, the overland transport theory is regarded by some historians and archaeologists as a legend or myth, due to the lack of conclusive evidence.
In summary, modern technology and research have provided some evidence that the Ottomans built their ships in secrecy, launched them, and prepared them for the siege without being noticed. However, the exact locations and methods of construction, as well as how the ships were launched and readied for the siege without detection by the Byzantines, remain subjects of debate. New discoveries and technological advances may yet provide clearer answers to these questions.
How Did the Debate Begin?
Sources and Debates
Technological and Practical Challenges
Ship Construction and Launch Process
Secrecy and Avoiding Detection by the Byzantines
Controversial Points