This article was automatically translated from the original Turkish version.
+1 More
Digital hoarding is defined as a condition in which individuals continuously acquire digital content such as emails, digital images, videos, electronic documents, and software, experience significant difficulty in deleting or organizing these materials, and suffer stress or psychological distress due to the accumulation of unmanageable data. This phenomenon, also referred to in the literature as “e-hoarding,” “data hoarding,” or “cyber hoarding,” is regarded as the digital manifestation of physical hoarding disorder (disposophobia) in the context of technological advancements.

Comparative Visual of Physical Hoarding and Digital Hoarding (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)
Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Framework
Digital hoarding exhibits parallels with the “hoarding disorder” diagnostic criteria outlined by the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-5, both in its psychological and behavioral foundations. The theoretical underpinning of the concept draws on Freud’s “anal triad” — linking orderliness, frugality, and obstinacy — as well as modern cognitive-behavioral models. One of the primary theories used to explain digital hoarding is attachment theory, which posits that individuals form intense emotional bonds with digital content (e.g., photos, messages), treating these items as security objects, such that their deletion evokes grief-like emotional responses.

Theoretical Framework Diagram Illustrating the Relationship Between Hoarder, Content, and Space (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)
To explain the dynamics between traditional and digital hoarding, the “hoarder-content-space” framework has been developed. According to this framework, the key distinctions between digital and physical hoarding are as follows:
Digital hoarding consists of three primary sub-dimensions:

Character Cards Representing Four Distinct Types of Digital Hoarders Identified in the Literature (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)
Researchers have categorized digital hoarders into four main types based on behavioral patterns:
Factors driving individuals toward digital hoarding are classified as technological, psychological, and instrumental.

Cyclical Flow Diagram of Digital Hoarding Behavior and Psychological Processes (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)
The near-zero cost of data storage (hard drives, cloud subscriptions) and the perception of “nearly unlimited” capacity have eliminated the necessity for selective behavior.
The belief that data may hold potential future value, leading to its retention out of a “better safe than sorry” mindset, is one of the most common motivations.
Photos and messages are perceived as extensions of individuals’ pasts and identities. Deleting such data is often experienced as losing a part of one’s history or having one’s life taken away.
Sorting and organizing accumulated data — such as deleting thousands of emails — demands considerable time and cognitive effort, leading individuals to avoid the task and instead retain the data.
Studies conducted among young people aged 18–21 in Türkiye have revealed that digital hoarding is particularly prevalent among the generation referred to as “digital natives”【1】 and exhibits culturally specific characteristics. Digital natives may experience distress related to the accumulation and management of digital data.
In a study by Çiğdem Berber Çelik and Feridun Kaya (2023), the “Digital Hoarding Scale” was adapted to Turkish culture. Conducted with 544 participants, the study confirmed the scale’s two-dimensional structure in the Turkish sample: “difficulty discarding” and “accumulation.” The findings demonstrated significant positive correlations between digital hoarding and obsessive-compulsive symptoms as well as chronic anxiety.【2】
Digital hoarding produces various negative outcomes at both individual and organizational levels:
In organizational contexts, digital hoarding increases cybersecurity risks. Retaining unnecessary data expands the volume of sensitive information vulnerable to breaches and creates legal compliance issues (e.g., KVKK/GDPR). Furthermore, the storage of trillions of redundant files on cloud servers increases energy consumption in data centers, generating a significant carbon footprint and causing environmental harm.

Comprehensive Statistical Dashboard Showing Individual Data Storage Volumes, Digital Preference Rates, and Anxiety Correlations (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)
Research on the topic reports that the average individual stores 3.7 TB of data, with maximum storage reaching up to 47 TB. The fact that over 300 million photos are shared daily on social media platforms (e.g., Facebook) and that 1.7 MB of data is generated per second illustrates the scale of data flows fueling hoarding behavior.【5】
[1]
Mustafa İşliyen, “Dijital Çağın Yeni Hastalığı: Dijital İstifçilik,” Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi 31 (2019): 412, erişim 7 Aralık 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/760530.
[2]
Çiğdem Berber Çelik ve Feridun Kaya, “Dijital İstifçilik Ölçeği Türkçe Formu’nun Psikometrik Özellikleri,” Edebiyat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi 71: 109, erişim 7 Aralık 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/literatureandhumanities/article/1414814
[3]
İşliyen, “Dijital İstifçilik,” 411–417.
[4]
Mine Demirtaş ve Nur Emine Koç, “Bilgi Çağının Yeni Trendi: Dijital İstifçilik Üzerine Bir Araştırma,” RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi 28 (2022): 300, erişim 7 Aralık 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rumelide/issue/70436/1132565
[5]
Sedera, Lokuge ve Grover, “Modern-Day Hoarding,” 1.
Dimensions and Types of Digital Hoarding
Causes and Motivations
Low Storage Costs
“It Might Be Useful Later” Mentality
Emotional Attachment and Memory Accumulation
Laziness and Time Constraints
Research and Findings in Türkiye
Scale Adaptation and Psychometric Studies
Qualitative Research and Focus Group Findings
Consequences and Impacts
Organizational and Environmental Impacts
Statistical Data