Agenda

Donald Trump–Vladimir Putin Alaska Summit (2025)

Trump and Putin met in Anchorage, Alaska on August 15, 2025, but no ceasefire was achieved during the three-hour summit. The leaders stated that progress had been made, but no concrete agreement was announced.
Donald Trump–Vladimir Putin Alaska Summit (2025) image
Broadcast IconRecently Added:
badge icon

This article was automatically translated from the original Turkish version.

Article

August 13, 2025

The Trump–Putin Alaska Summit was a meeting held on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska, between United States President Donald Trump and Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin. The summit was organized during the ongoing Russia–Ukraine War with the aim of discussing potential ceasefire conditions and diplomatic pathways to end the conflict. The meeting lasted approximately three hours and was conducted under the theme “Pursuing Peace”.



Senior officials from both sides’ foreign policy teams attended the meeting. On the U.S. side, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff were present; on the Russian side, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Kremlin Foreign Policy Advisor Yuriy Ushakov participated. Thus, the summit was conducted in a “three-on-three” format. Vladimir Putin, for the first time since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, set foot on Western territory during this summit.



Pre-Summit Preparations and Expectations

U.S. Preparations

The U.S. side conducted its pre-summit preparations through both diplomatic outreach and public communication efforts. President Donald Trump announced the upcoming meeting via the social media platform Truth Social. Trump emphasized the uncertainty surrounding the outcome, stating that the talks with Putin “could go well or poorly,” but underscored that his primary objective was “to end this war.”


Before the summit, the U.S. administration intensified its consultations with European allies and Ukraine. White House officials held discussions with European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to preliminarily assess Putin’s proposals. These consultations aimed to shape potential negotiation parameters and develop a unified position among allies.


In statements prior to the summit, Trump indicated openness to listening to Putin’s proposals but clarified that no draft agreement or definitive resolution plan was on the table. The White House officially stated that the primary purpose of the meeting was to directly understand the other side’s demands and expectations.


Before departing for Alaska, Trump outlined his expectations during a flight aboard “Air Force One” and in an interview with Fox News. He stated that he would not negotiate a direct agreement on Ukraine but would work to create conditions conducive to such an agreement. He also warned that if the talks did not proceed as expected, he would “walk away.” Trump further noted that no new sanctions would be imposed immediately as long as progress was made in relations with Russia.

Russian Preparations

Kremlin Foreign Policy Advisor Yuriy Ushakov publicly explained the rationale for selecting Alaska as the summit venue. He cited Alaska’s geographical proximity to Russia, its strategic location, and the historical ties between the two nations as key reasons for the choice. He also emphasized Alaska’s significance in terms of economic projects and transportation routes in the Arctic region.


The Kremlin also raised the possibility of a second meeting in Moscow following the Alaska summit. Prior to the summit, Russia announced that the agenda would focus primarily on halting hostilities in Ukraine and addressing regional security issues. Coordination between U.S. authorities and the Russian delegation ensured logistical, security, and transportation arrangements for the Russian side.

Historical Significance of Putin’s Visit to Alaska

Putin’s visit to Alaska marks his first trip to the United States since 2015. It also makes him the first Russian president to visit Alaska. This event is recorded as a first in the diplomatic history of the two countries.



The historical background for Alaska’s selection stems from the 1867 sale of Alaska by the Russian Empire to the United States of America. This process, known as the “Alaska Purchase,” is one of the most well-known diplomatic turning points in relations between the two countries. The Bering Strait, which geographically separates Russia and the United States, lies between Little Diomede Island in western Alaska and Big Diomede Island in Russia, forming the international boundary between the two nations.


The region’s geographical position is considered important not only historically but also strategically. Maritime routes opening onto the Arctic Ocean are enabling the emergence of new trade corridors due to climate change. Alaska’s geopolitical position also holds strategic value for both countries in terms of energy resources, minerals and military bases.

Reactions from Ukraine and Europe

Ukrainian Government Statements and Ukraine–USA Consultations

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in statements made prior to the summit, emphasized that his country would not make territorial concessions and would uphold its sovereignty within its constitutional borders. Zelensky took a clear stance against any demand for the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from the Donetsk region, stating that such a demand contradicted the country’s territorial integrity and would not be accepted.



The Ukrainian government intensified its diplomatic outreach to strengthen international support during this period. Zelensky traveled to Berlin to meet with German officials to reinforce coordination with European capitals. During these consultations, the potential outcomes of the upcoming Trump–Putin summit and Ukraine’s position were discussed.

Joint Statement by European Countries

Twenty-six member states of the European Union issued a joint statement prior to the Trump–Putin summit. The statement affirmed full support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty and emphasized that international borders cannot be altered by force. European leaders explicitly stated that no peace decision concerning Ukraine could be made without Ukraine’s participation.


The statement further noted that ending the war in Ukraine is critical for European security but must be achieved within the framework of international law and with the consent of all parties. The European Union stressed that Europe’s interests must also be taken into account in the US–Russia talks.


Divergent positions were also observed within the Union. Hungary signed the joint statement but adopted a more cautious approach, while Poland called for unconditional support for Ukraine. NATO and EU officials highlighted the importance of sustaining transatlantic solidarity and coordination in security policies.

Russia’s Concurrent Diplomatic Moves

In the lead-up to the Trump–Putin summit in Alaska, Russia undertook parallel diplomatic initiatives. The Kremlin maintained contacts with various regional leaders during the preparatory phase. In this context, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a telephone conversation with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The conversation covered bilateral relations as well as “all accumulated issues” on the international agenda.


The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in statements made prior to the summit, reaffirmed its position on Ukraine in line with the stance established in June 2024. This position favors maintaining the status quo in territories under Russian control, including the Donetsk region, rather than withdrawing from them.

Format of the Summit

Initially planned as a one-on-one meeting between the two leaders, the format was later revised to include two senior officials from each side. Thus, the talks were conducted in a “three-on-three” format. On the U.S. side, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Representative Steve Witkoff participated; on the Russian side, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Kremlin foreign policy advisor Yuriy Ushakov were present.

Chronology (8–13 August 2025)

8 August 2025 – Washington / Moscow

  • The official announcement confirmed that the Trump–Putin summit in Alaska would take place on 15 August 2025, with Alaska designated as the location.
  • Putin’s proposal for a territorial exchange became public, with reports indicating that it involved a ceasefire in return for Ukraine’s withdrawal from the Donetsk region.

9–10 August 2025 – Brussels / Moscow

  • European Union leaders worked on drafting a joint statement ahead of the summit, planning to include support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity and the principle that borders cannot be changed by force.
  • The Kremlin disclosed details regarding the Alaska summit, listing geographical proximity, strategic interests in the Arctic region and symbolic significance as reasons for selecting Alaska.

11 August 2025 – Washington / Moscow / Anchorage

  • U.S. President Donald Trump made statements evaluating the Alaska meeting and outlined expectations for the summit.
  • It was publicly announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin would be the first Russian leader to visit Alaska.
  • Security units and local authorities in Alaska made decisions regarding public safety measures to be implemented during the summit.

12 August 2025 – Donetsk / Moscow / Brussels

  • Clashes were reported to be ongoing in the Donetsk region.
  • A telephone conversation took place between Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, addressing bilateral relations and “all accumulated issues” on the international agenda.
  • The European Union issued a statement reiterating its support for Ukraine and emphasizing the principle of territorial integrity.

13 August 2025 – Berlin / Washington / Anchorage

  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky held consultations in Berlin with European leaders to coordinate positions.
  • Under the hosting of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders participated in a virtual meeting. Consensus was reached on “red lines” and a four-point framework.
  • European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that the meeting had “strengthened the common ground.”

13–14 August 2025 – Washington / Moscow

  • In Washington, Trump stated that if no agreement on ending the war is reached during the Alaska meeting, the United States would take “serious consequences” against Russia.
  • Trump mentioned the possibility of a second summit bringing together Putin and Zelensky if the first meeting went well, noting that he himself could also attend if requested.

15 August 2025 – Anchorage, Alaska

  • Trump and Putin met in Anchorage for a summit themed “In Pursuit of Peace.”
  • The talks were conducted in a “three-on-three” format.
    • Trump was accompanied by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Representative Steve Witkoff.
    • Putin’s delegation included Sergey Lavrov and Yuriy Ushakov.
  • The meeting lasted approximately three hours.
  • The planned lunch was canceled.

15 August 2025 – Elmendorf–Richardson Military Base, Anchorage

  • A joint press conference was held at the conclusion of the summit.
  • Trump: “Agreement was reached on many issues, but we could not reach consensus on some critical matters. Until an agreement is reached, there is no agreement.”
  • Putin: He assessed the talks as “constructive and beneficial.”

15 August 2025 – Fort Richardson Memorial Cemetery, Anchorage

  • Putin visited the graves of Soviet soldiers who died during World War II under the Lend-Lease program.
  • He laid flowers at the cemetery.
  • He met with an Orthodox religious official in Alaska.

August 15, 2025

Online Meetings of 13 August 2025

Defining “Red Lines” and a Common Framework under German Hosting

On 13 August 2025, under the hosting of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, leaders of European countries, representatives of European Union institutions, and NATO officials participated in a coordinated online meeting. The meeting was convened to establish a common negotiation framework and priority principles among transatlantic allies ahead of the Trump–Putin summit.

Participants included the leaders of Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Poland, Finland, and Italy, along with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President Charles Michel, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The meeting was conducted in two phases: in the first phase, European and Ukrainian leaders held internal consultations; in the second phase, U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Vice President JD Vance joined the session.

In a statement following the meeting, Chancellor Merz confirmed that all participants reaffirmed the principle that international borders cannot be altered by force. It was also decided that if no progress is made by Russia, political and economic pressure measures will be intensified.

French President Emmanuel Macron reported that Trump had raised the goal of a ceasefire during the Alaska meeting and emphasized that territorial issues can only be negotiated by Ukraine itself.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, in a statement prior to the summit, asserted that Ukraine cannot be forced into surrender, Russia cannot be trusted, and NATO security guarantees must be preserved. He also stressed the necessity of maintaining the presence of allied forces in the region.

The meeting clarified “red lines” that would define negotiation positions ahead of the Alaska summit, and these principles were formally agreed upon by transatlantic partners.

Four-Point Framework by Co-Chairs of the “Coalition of the Willing”

During the online coordination meeting of 13 August 2025, the co-chairs of the “Coalition of the Willing” — Germany, France, and the United Kingdom — presented a four-point negotiation framework in support of Ukraine.

The first point stipulated that meaningful negotiations can only proceed in an environment where a ceasefire has been achieved or hostilities have ceased permanently or substantially. The second point foresaw the intensification of sanctions and economic measures if Russia rejects the ceasefire proposal during the Alaska meeting. The third point reaffirmed the principle that international borders cannot be altered by force. The fourth point established key principles: ensuring strong security guarantees for Ukraine, deploying a “reassurance force” after the cessation of hostilities, imposing no restrictions on the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and prohibiting Russia from vetoing Ukraine’s path toward European Union or NATO membership. This framework formed the foundational elements of the negotiation positions to be presented at the Alaska summit and was formally recorded by all participants.

Context of EU Institutions and NATO

Regarding the online coordination meeting of 13 August 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that the meeting was convened at Germany’s invitation and focused on safeguarding the security interests of Europe and Ukraine and strengthening deterrence. Von der Leyen noted that the meeting reinforced the common ground among the European Union, the United States, and NATO regarding Ukraine.

According to the statement, the meeting addressed the need for coordinated action between EU institutions and NATO, including enhanced information sharing and alignment of strategic objectives. In this context, the complementary use of diplomatic, military, and economic instruments by the EU and NATO was highlighted.

In a separate assessment on the same day, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated that the initiative for achieving peace in Ukraine lies with Russia and emphasized that “the ball is in Putin’s court.” This statement underscored NATO’s view that progress in the negotiation process depends on the steps Russia takes.

Ukraine’s Priorities

At the online coordination meeting of 13 August 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called for the urgent inclusion of an “immediate ceasefire” in the Trump–Putin talks. Zelensky emphasized that this demand was a priority to halt ongoing hostilities and ensure civilian safety. In the lead-up to and following the meeting, Zelensky engaged in intensive diplomatic consultations with numerous world leaders.

The Ukrainian side affirmed that territorial issues can only be negotiated by Ukraine itself, that international borders cannot be altered by force, and that any relinquishment of territory in the Donbas region or other occupied areas is unacceptable. It was also recalled that, under Ukraine’s constitution, any change in territory can only be decided through a national referendum.

Preemptive Warnings and Potential Sanction Scenarios from the United States

U.S. President Donald Trump declared that if no agreement is reached at the summit to end the war, the United States will take steps that will result in “severe consequences” for Russia. This statement was interpreted as part of the coordination efforts among allies ahead of the summit.

According to media reports, in the event that the summit yields no concrete outcome, the U.S. administration is considering the option of “beginning to dismantle the Russian economy.” Under this scenario, steps are being planned to expand existing sanctions against Russia, increase economic restrictions, and block third-country support channels to Russia.


By the end of July 2025, additional customs duties were imposed on India due to its oil imports from Russia. This move has been cited as an example of potential secondary sanctions against third countries if the Alaska summit fails to produce positive outcomes.

Additionally, plans to continue arms shipments to Ukraine via NATO countries were included in the pre-summit agenda. It was indicated that these shipments could be increased and sustained if no political solutions are found to halt the war.

Tripartite Talks Option and Possibility of a Second Summit

U.S. President Donald Trump stated that if the first meeting proceeds positively, a second summit could be organized bringing together Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He added that he himself could participate in such talks if requested.

Assessment Meeting at the Kremlin on 14 August

An assessment meeting was held at the Kremlin on 14 August 2025 under the chairmanship of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Senior Russian officials attended the meeting in preparation for the Trump–Putin summit.

Putin, in his remarks during the meeting, stated that the U.S. administration has undertaken “energetic and sincere” efforts to end the Ukraine crisis and establish long-term peace conditions. He also indicated that agreements on the control of strategic offensive weapons could be reached in later stages of the process.

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the approach to be taken at the Alaska talks has been determined in line with the country’s national interests. It was reported that the Russian delegation, which includes Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, has been preparing on issues of security, territorial arrangements, lifting of sanctions and long-term peace arrangements.

The meeting also reviewed Russia’s allegations regarding Ukraine’s use of unmanned aerial vehicles for attacks, as well as recent developments in the conflict situation and frontline dynamics.

August 16, 2025

Summit Launch (August 15, 2025)

On the day of the summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin landed at Elmendorf–Richardson Military Base in Anchorage. Upon exiting his aircraft, he was met by U.S. President Donald Trump on a red carpet. American military personnel were present during the welcome, and an aerial display featuring military aircraft including fighter jets and bombers was conducted during the ceremony.



Trump and Putin shook hands on the red carpet and posed for the press. Footage showed Trump applauding Putin and both leaders smiling at the cameras. This reception drew attention as it marked Putin’s first such protocol-level welcome in the West since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In previous years, Putin’s international travels had typically been limited to countries such as Belarus and North Korea.


After the welcoming ceremony, the leaders entered Trump’s armored vehicle together and proceeded to the hall where the summit would be held. Putin’s decision to ride in Trump’s vehicle rather than his own state car was noted as an unusual gesture. Media personnel were shown footage during this time but were not permitted to ask questions.

After the arrival of the senior delegations scheduled to attend the summit, the meeting commenced. Initial official program announcements indicated the talks would be held one-on-one, but a later adjustment confirmed the format would be “three-on-three.”



Before the summit began, the leaders, accompanied by their military and diplomatic delegations, posed for photographs in front of a banner reading “Pursuing Peace.” Neither leader delivered an opening speech or responded to media questions.


Course of the Talks

The Trump-Putin summit was held in closed session and lasted approximately three hours. The discussions fell short of the originally anticipated 6–7 hours proposed by the Kremlin. The meeting followed a “three-on-three” format with the two leaders and two senior officials each. On the U.S. side, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Middle East Representative Steve Witkoff participated; on the Russian side, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Kremlin Foreign Policy Advisor Yuriy Ushakov were present.


Ukraine Crisis and Ceasefire

The central agenda of the talks was the war in Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump stated that his priority was achieving a rapid ceasefire. He emphasized that continuing the war would result in “thousands of lives lost per week” and insisted that hostilities must end. However, no ceasefire agreement was signed by the end of the discussions.


Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that peace could only be achieved if the “root causes” of the conflict were addressed. He stressed that Russia’s “legitimate security concerns” must be taken into account and urged Europe and Ukraine to accept this process “constructively.”


Security Guarantees and Possible Territorial Arrangements

In a statement following his meeting with Putin, Trump said that security guarantees for Ukraine and possible territorial arrangements were on the agenda. He noted that some progress had been made on these issues but emphasized that the final decision rested with Ukraine. He also revealed that he had advised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “reach an agreement.”


Putin did not directly address territorial adjustments but used language implying Russia’s longstanding claims over Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson as part of the “root causes” of the war. He indirectly reiterated that Ukraine must remain neutral, foreign troops must withdraw, and new elections must be held.


Bilateral Relations and Economic Issues

Bilateral U.S.-Russia relations were also discussed at the summit. Putin noted an increase in trade volume in recent times and highlighted potential cooperation in digital technology, energy, high-tech industries, and space. He also suggested joint initiatives could be pursued in the Arctic region.


Trump, in a statement after the summit, announced that new tariffs planned against China had been postponed. Specifically, additional sanctions targeting China’s purchases of Russian oil were removed from the agenda. Trump stated that these matters “could be reassessed in the coming weeks.”

Atmosphere of the Talks

Both leaders described the talks as having taken place in a “constructive, mutually respectful, and productive” atmosphere. Putin thanked Trump for the invitation, while Trump characterized the meeting as “very productive.” The leaders stated they had reached agreement on many issues but noted that progress had not yet been achieved on several critical topics.

Canceled Events

The planned lunch following the summit was canceled. No official explanation was given for the cancellation. After the talks concluded, both leaders returned to the base to prepare for their departures.

Joint Statements by the Leaders

Vladimir Putin’s Remarks

After the summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke first at the press conference. He opened his remarks by referencing Alaska’s historical ties, recalling that Alaska had been sold by Russia to the United States in the 19th century and emphasizing the region as a symbol of the two nations’ shared past. He also noted that during World War II, military equipment and aircraft were transported to the Soviet Union via Alaska under the Lend-Lease program.



Putin described the atmosphere of the talks as “constructive, mutually respectful, and productive.” He noted that direct face-to-face meetings with Trump had not occurred in a long time and that this encounter was necessary. He stated that U.S.-Russia relations had reached their lowest point since the Cold War but stressed that restoring dialogue was essential.


On Ukraine, Putin reiterated that peace could only be achieved if the “root causes” of the conflict were eliminated, underscoring Russia’s long-standing security demands. He expressed his expectation that Ukraine and European capitals would accept this process “constructively” and warned against the process being obstructed by “backroom intrigues.”


Putin also affirmed the importance of securing Ukraine’s safety. He expressed agreement with Trump’s statements on the matter and said he hoped the understanding reached at the summit could contribute to peace in Ukraine.

Donald Trump’s Remarks

U.S. President Donald Trump took the podium after Putin. He characterized the talks as “very productive,” saying, “We reached agreement on many issues, but we have not yet reached consensus on a few important ones.” He summarized this stance with the phrase, “No deal until a deal is made.”



Trump acknowledged that some issues involved minor differences but emphasized that one issue was “perhaps the most important” and required progress. He stated that “successful steps” had been taken in many areas but provided no details.


Trump announced that after the summit he would speak by phone with NATO officials and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, saying these conversations would play a key role in shaping the process following the summit.


On sanctions, Trump indicated that new sanctions against Russia were not being considered for immediate implementation. He confirmed that additional tariffs planned against China had been postponed but noted these matters could be reassessed in the coming weeks.

Common Emphases

Both leaders emphasized that the talks had taken place in a positive atmosphere. Trump described the meeting as one in which “significant progress” had been made, while Putin described it as “mutually respectful.” The joint statement concluded that progress had been made toward peace, but no binding agreement had been reached.



No questions were taken from journalists during the press conference; only brief statements were made. This approach was particularly noted by international media.

Reactions from Ukraine and Europe

Ukraine’s Reaction

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to the summit. This confirmed that Kiev’s prior request for a trilateral format had not been accepted. Before the summit, Zelensky had emphasized that Ukraine’s “top priority” was a ceasefire and stated that lasting peace talks could only follow such a condition. He also insisted that Ukraine must be directly involved in all matters and that any agreement reached without its participation would be invalid.


Immediately after the summit, no official response came from Kiev. Opposition MP Oleksiy Honcharenko, in a Telegram post, claimed Putin had gained time, noting that no concrete ceasefire or de-escalation decision emerged from the summit. In Ukraine, public opinion interpreted Putin’s statement that “root causes of the conflict must be eliminated” as evidence that Moscow had not abandoned its broad demands. The Ukrainian government also pointed out that despite claims of progress, Russia continued its attacks on Ukrainian cities.

Expectations of European Countries

Before the summit, European countries had engaged in consultations with U.S. President Trump. Germany and France, in particular, stressed the need for a concrete ceasefire outcome from the talks. No European representative was present during the summit, but Trump had announced he would brief NATO and European leaders afterward.


The summit’s failure to produce a ceasefire outcome disappointed European capitals. European diplomats indicated they found it reassuring that Trump met with Putin in a bilateral format rather than with full delegations. Nevertheless, the absence of any concrete step led many to assess the summit as “below expectations” from a European perspective.


NATO and Transatlantic Alliance Stance

NATO allies had coordinated with Trump before the Alaska meeting. Prior statements suggested Trump would be insistent on a ceasefire, but after the summit produced no outcome, NATO circles expressed the view that Moscow had used the negotiations to buy time in its favor.


Within NATO, Trump’s announcement that he would speak with Zelensky and European leaders after the summit was interpreted as a signal that the alliance would not be excluded from the process.

Post-Summit Developments

Trump’s Statements and Interviews

Following the summit, U.S. President Donald Trump assessed the talks in an interview with Fox News. He said security guarantees for Ukraine and possible territorial arrangements had been discussed and that “significant consensus” had been reached on these matters, though he stressed the final decision rested with Ukraine. He reiterated his advice to Zelensky: “He needs to make a deal.”


Trump also confirmed that new tariffs planned against China had been postponed after the summit. He said, “We can reassess this in two or three weeks, but for now it is not necessary.” However, no changes were made to the previously announced 25 percent additional tariff on India.

Possibility of a Trilateral Summit

After the summit, Trump suggested the possibility of arranging a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, with himself potentially participating. He stated that both sides had expressed a desire to meet with him. No details were provided regarding when or how such a trilateral format might occur.

Putin’s Activities

After the summit, Putin visited Fort Richardson Military Cemetery in Alaska, where he laid flowers at the graves of Soviet pilots and sailors who died during World War II while serving under the Lend-Lease program. He also held a brief meeting with Orthodox religious officials in Alaska.


The Phrase “Next Time in Moscow”

At the end of the summit, Putin’s use of the English phrase “Next time in Moscow” received widespread media attention. Trump responded with, “I might get some criticism for that, but it’s possible.” This exchange raised the possibility of a second summit being held in Russia. Diplomatic circles interpreted the remark as a sign that contacts between Washington and Moscow would continue.

Protests and Public Reactions During the Summit

On the day of the summit, anti-war groups organized protests around Elmendorf–Richardson Base and in downtown Anchorage. Demonstrators condemned Russia’s attacks on Ukraine and criticized the U.S. administration for meeting with Putin. Participants called for a ceasefire and carried Ukrainian flags and anti-war banners.



In addition to demonstrations in Alaska, smaller protests against the Trump-Putin summit occurred in other U.S. cities. Critics labeled the meeting a “waste of time” for failing to produce a concrete ceasefire. Some groups argued that the U.S. should impose harsher sanctions on Russia.



The Ukrainian diaspora in the United States actively participated in the protests. Demonstrators criticized Ukraine’s exclusion from the negotiations and chanted the slogan “No peace without Ukraine.” This group viewed Trump’s bilateral meeting with Putin as an act of sidelining Ukraine.

Author Information

Avatar
AuthorEdanur KarakoçAugust 13, 2025 at 11:23 AM

Tags

Summary

On August 15, 2025, Trump and Putin met at Elmendorf–Richardson Base in the U.S. state of Alaska. Joining the talks were U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff from the United States and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Yuriy Ushakov from Russia. The summit, which lasted approximately three hours, did not produce a ceasefire agreement. Trump stated that progress had been made on many issues, while Putin emphasized the need to eliminate the root causes of the conflict. The meeting ended without a concrete agreement or ceasefire.

Discussions

No Discussion Added Yet

Start discussion for "Donald Trump–Vladimir Putin Alaska Summit (2025)" article

View Discussions

Contents

  • August 13, 2025

    Pre-Summit Preparations and Expectations

  • August 13, 2025

    Historical Significance of Putin’s Visit to Alaska

  • August 13, 2025

    Reactions from Ukraine and Europe

  • August 13, 2025

    Russia’s Concurrent Diplomatic Moves

  • August 13, 2025

    Format of the Summit

  • August 13, 2025

    Chronology (8–13 August 2025)

  • August 15, 2025

    Online Meetings of 13 August 2025

  • August 15, 2025

    Preemptive Warnings and Potential Sanction Scenarios from the United States

  • August 15, 2025

    Tripartite Talks Option and Possibility of a Second Summit

  • August 15, 2025

    Assessment Meeting at the Kremlin on 14 August

  • August 16, 2025

    Summit Launch (August 15, 2025)

  • August 16, 2025

    Course of the Talks

  • August 16, 2025

    Joint Statements by the Leaders

  • August 16, 2025

    Reactions from Ukraine and Europe

  • August 16, 2025

    Post-Summit Developments

  • August 16, 2025

    Protests and Public Reactions During the Summit

Ask to Küre